Journal of Food Security. 2015, 3(3), 87-93
DOI: 10.12691/JFS-3-3-4
Original Research

Rural Community Coping Strategies with Drought-Driven Food Insecurity in Kwale County, Kenya

Andrew Makoti1 and Fuchaka Waswa2,

1Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Kilifi County

2Department of Agricultural Resource Management, Kenyatta University

Pub. Date: October 15, 2015

Cite this paper

Andrew Makoti and Fuchaka Waswa. Rural Community Coping Strategies with Drought-Driven Food Insecurity in Kwale County, Kenya. Journal of Food Security. 2015; 3(3):87-93. doi: 10.12691/JFS-3-3-4

Abstract

This paper discusses how households in Kwale in Kenya cope with drought-driven food insecurity and also provides suggestions to inform sustainable mitigation planning. This area was purposively selected because it suffers the most severe food insecurity levels in Kwale County. The main respondents were 120 households selected using stratified random sampling and 20 key informants selected purposively. Primary data was collected using questionnaires, focus group discussions and environmental observation checklists. Since the goal was to determine general trends, data analysis focused on descriptive statistics. Findings indicated that major droughts tend to occur every 10-15 years while minor ones after every 3-4 years. Failure of staple food crops and livestock losses elicits severe negative impacts on the community’s well-being. Further, technical mitigation measures perceived as effective were not necessarily the most popular with the community. For instance growing drought resistant crops was ranked first by 90% of the respondents, perception on its effectiveness placed it 4th rank in favour of water reservoirs, whose priority ranking was 7th by 25% of respondents. Similarly, diversification of income was prioritized by 71% of respondents, yet placed as second in effectiveness in favour of engaging in waged labour, whose priority ranking was 3rd by 58% of respondents. By implication, decision-making for lasting mitigation measures requires the input of farmers. In conclusion, short to medium term drought coping mechanisms should focus on diversifying food and income opportunities for households. As such farmers need to be empowered to access financial credit for investment. At the county level, investing in water resources development for irrigation agriculture and improvements in livestock management remain key long-term mitigation measures. The requisite community capacity building calls for coordinated public-private-civil society partnerships.

Keywords

household food security, drought, mitigation

Copyright

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]  Alcamo,J., N. Ash, N.J., Butler, C. D. Callicott, J. B. Capistrano, D. Carpenter, S. R. et al. (2003). Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Framework, Island press, Washington DC.
 
[2]  Hazell. P (2001). ‘Strategies for the Sustainable Development of Dry Lands Areas. http://www.ired.org/modules/infodoc/cache/files/pdf/anglais/doc_e415.pdf (accessed in September 2015).
 
[3]  Hisdal, H. and Tallaksen, L.M. (eds) (2000). Assessment of the Regional Impacts of Drought in Europe. Drought Event Definition. Technical Report to the ARIDE Project No.6. Department of Geophysics, University of Oslo, Norway. (http://www.hydrology.uni-freiburg.de/forsch/aride/navigation/publications/pdfs/aride-techrep6.pdf).
 
[4]  Hussein, K. and Nelson, J. (1998). Sustainable livelihoods and livelihood diversification. Institute of Development Studies. Working Paper Number 69. (https://www.ids.ac.uk/ids/bookshop/wp/wp69.pdf.
 
[5]  IFPRI (2002). Sustainable Food Security for All by 2020. Proceedings of an International Conference, September 4-6, Bonn, Germany. International Food Policy Research Institute.
 
[6]  Jaetzold, R., Schmidt, H., Hornetz, B and Shisanya, C. (2005). Farm Management Handbook of Kenya, Revised Edition Vol. II, Natural Conditions and Farm Management Information, Ministry of Agriculture / The German Agency for Technical Cooperation, Nairobi.
 
[7]  Lamprey, H. F, and Yusuf, H. (1981). Pastoralism and Desert Encroachment in Northern Kenya. Ambio 10 (2), 131-134. Accessed in September 2015 at http://www.jstor.org/stable/4312657?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
 
[8]  Little, P., Mahmood, H., and Coppock, D. L. (2001). When Desert Flood: Risk Management and Climatic Processes among East African Pastoralists. Climate Research, 19, 149-159.
 
[9]  Nicola, R. (2006). Policies and Strategies to Address the Vulnerability of Pastoralists in Sub-Saharan Africa. http://www.fao.org/ag/pplpi.html. (Accessed in 2008).
 
[10]  Paxson, C.H. (1992). “Using Weather Variability to Estimate the Response of Savings to Transitory Income in Thailand,” American Economic Review, 82 (1): 15-33.
 
[11]  Republic of Kenya (1999). Kenya National Bureau of Statistics Household Survey Report, Government Printers, Nairobi.
 
[12]  Republic of Kenya (2008). Constituency Report on Well-Being in Kenya, Government Printer, Nairobi.
 
[13]  Republic of Kenya (2009). Kenya National Bureau of Statistics Population and Housing Census Report. Government Printers, Nairobi.
 
[14]  Shauri.H, (2011). Drought and Famine Mitigation Strategies; Basics, Concepts and Strategies, Lambert Academic Publishers, Germany.
 
[15]  Swift, J. and Hamilton, K. (2001). Household and Livelihood Security. In: Devereux, S. and Maxwell, S. (eds), Food Security in Sub-Saharan Africa. London: ITDG Publishing, pp. 67 92.
 
[16]  UNEP (2009). “Kenya: Atlas of Our Changing Environment.” Division of Early Warning and Assessment. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi.
 
[17]  Waswa, F., Otor, S, and Mugendi, D. (eds) (2006). Environment and Sustainable Development: A Guide for Tertiary Education in Kenya. Volume I. School of Environmental Studies and Human Science, Kenyatta University: 1-19.
 
[18]  Wilhite, D.A., (1996). A Methodology for Drought Preparedness. Natural Hazards. 13, 229-252.