Khat Production and Consumption; Its Implication on Land Area Used for Crop Production and Crop Variety Production among Rural Household of Ethiopia

Beyene Wondafrash Ademe^{1, 2,} , Jennifer Coates C³, Anders Dalsgaard², Leon Brimer² and Tefera Belachew Lema⁴

¹Jimma University, College of Public Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Population and Family Health, Jimma, Ethiopia

²Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

³Tufts University School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Boston, USA

⁴Department of Population and Family Health, College of Health Sciences, Jimma University, Ethiopia

Cite this paper

Beyene Wondafrash Ademe, Jennifer Coates C, Anders Dalsgaard, Leon Brimer and Tefera Belachew Lema. Khat Production and Consumption; Its Implication on Land Area Used for Crop Production and Crop Variety Production among Rural Household of Ethiopia. Journal of Food Security. 2017; 5(4):148-154. doi: 10.12691/JFS-5-4-5

Abstract

Khat (Catha edulis Forsk), is a stimulant plant grown mainly in Ethiopia, Yemen and Kenya. Currently it is a ubiquitous commodity cultivated and chewed; imbedded in Ethiopian culture and agriculture. In a circumstance of land degradation and scarcity farmers consider Khat as a better small-scale faming alternative; however land disposition for Khat-mono-cropping can be a disadvantage. Adjusting for the sets of alternatives on the land area to be used for crop production and on-farm crop variety is a factor that determines Khat farmers’ household sustainable agriculture and livelihood. The dynamics in relation with rural households Khat production/consumption is not well explored. This study sets out to document the implication of farmers’ choice of Khat production and / or consumption on land use for crop production and crop variety production in rural households of Ethiopia. A panel survey using quantitative method was adopted. Data were collected in two regions of Ethiopia using pre-tested interviewer-administered questionnaire using Open Data Kit (ODK). Data were exported to STATA version SE 12(Stata Corp LP, College Station, Texas, USA). Multivariable linear regression model was run. A significantly higher proportion of Khat consumers were producers (P<0.001). Land size used for crop production increased by 0.2 units (hectares) for Khat consumers and producers as compared with No-Khat consumers and no-Khat producers’ households (β=0.20, p<0.001). The likely hood of having variety of crops is two times higher for Khat consumer and Khat producer households as compared with no-Khat consumers and no-Khat producers households (AOR: 2.00 [95%CI: 1.38, 2.91], p<0.001). Land tenure system and agricultural policy and interventions should consider this Khat cropping effect among households in Khat producing areas of the country. Khat cultivation and use should be understood in a proper context in association with economical; social, cultural and environmental reality.

Keywords

Khat production and consumption, Land area used for crop production, crop variety production, ODK

Copyright

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]	Baack L. A naturalist of the Northern Enlightenment: Peter Forsskål after 250 years. Arch Nat Hist 2013; 40(1): 1-19.
[2]	Brenneisen R, Fisch H, Koelbing U, Geisshusler S, Kalix P. Amphetamine‐like effects in humans of the khat alkaloid cathinone. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1990; 30(6): 825-828.
[3]	Mela M, McBride A. Khat and khat misuse: an overview. J Subst Use 2000; 5(3): 218-226.
[4]	Gelaw Y, Haile-Amlak A. Khat chewing and its socio-demographic correlates among the staff of Jimma University. Ethiopian Journal of Health Development 2004; 18(3): 179-184.
[5]	Kalix P. Cathinone, a natural amphetamine. Pharmacol Toxicol 1992; 70(2): 77-86.
[6]	Gebissa E. Leaf of Allah: khat & agricultural transformation in Harerge, Ethiopia 1875-1991. : Ohio State University Press; 2004.
[7]	Fafchamps M. Cash crop production, food price volatility, and rural market integration in the third world. Am J Agric Econ 1992; 74(1): 90-99.
[8]	Cochrane L, O’Regan D. Legal harvest and illegal trade: Trends, challenges, and options in khat production in Ethiopia. International Journal of Drug Policy 2016 4; 30: 27-34.
[9]	Belwal R, Teshome H. Chat exports and the Ethiopian economy: Opportunities, dilemmas and constraints. African Journal of Business Management 2011 May 4, 2011; 5(9): 3635-3648.
[10]	Aden A, Dimba EA, Ndolo UM, Chindia ML. Socio-economic effects of khat chewing in north eastern Kenya. East Afr Med J 2006 Mar; 83(3): 69-73.
[11]	Megerssa B, Esayas A, Mohamed A. Socio-Economic Impact of Khat in Mana District, Jimma Zone, South Western Ethiopia. Discourse Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences 2014; 2(2): 21-32.
[12]	Pender J, Gebremedhin B. Determinants of agricultural and land management practices and impacts on crop production and household income in the highlands of Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of African Economies 2008; 17(3): 395-450.
[13]	Benin S, Smale M, Pender J, Gebremedhin B, Ehui S. The economic determinants of cereal crop diversity on farms in the Ethiopian highlands. Agricultural Economics 2004; 31(2-3): 197-208.
[14]	Kandari LS, Yadav HR, Thakur AK, Kandari T. Chat (Catha edulis): a socio economic crop in Harar Region, Eastern Ethiopia. Springerplus 2014 Oct 3; 3: 579-1801-3-579. eCollection 2014.
[15]	Karlsson S. Reducing farming household vulnerability in connection to Khat cultivation 2006. 42-54.
[16]	Gebissa E. Scourge of life or an economic lifeline? Public discourses on khat (Catha edulis) in Ethiopia. Subst Use Misuse 2008; 43(6): 784-802.
[17]	Seyoum E, Kidane Y, Gebru H, Sevenhuysen G. Preliminary study of income and nutritional status indicators in two Ethiopian communities. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 1986; 8(3): 37-41.
[18]	Harlan JR. Ethiopia: a center of diversity. Econ Bot 1969; 23(4): 309-314.
[19]	Vavilov NI. The origin, variation, immunity and breeding of cultivated plants. Soil Sci 1951; 72(6): 364.
[20]	Gezon LL. Drug crops and food security: the effects of khat on lives and livelihoods in northern madagascar. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment 2012; 34(2): 124-135.
[21]	Mulatu E, Kassa H. Evolution of smallholder mixed farming systems in the Harar Highlands of Ethiopia: The shift towards trees and shrubs. J Sustainable Agric 2001; 18(4): 81-112.
[22]	Crewett W, Bogale A, Korf B. Land Tenure in Ethiopia. Continuity and Change, Shifting Rulers, and the Quest for State Control.CAPRi Working Paper 2008; 91.
[23]	Gebreselassie S. Land, Land Policy and Smallholder Agriculture in Ethiopia: Options and Scenarios. 2006. 2-10.
[24]	Crewett W, Korf B. Ethiopia: Reforming land tenure. Rev Afr Polit Econ 2008; 35(116): 203-220.
[25]	Haile M. New Ethiopian Constitution: Its Impact upon Unity, Human Rights and Development, The. Suffolk Transnat'l L.Rev. 1996; 20: 1.
[26]	Tefera T, Kirsten J, Perret S. MARKET INCENTIVES, FARMERS' RESPONSE AND A POLICY DILEMMA: A CASE STUDY OF CHAT PRODUCTION IN THE EASTERN ETHIOPIAN HIGHLANDS. Agrekon 2003; 42(3): 213-227.
[27]	Dessie G. Is Khat a social ill? Ethical argument about a stimulant among the learned Ethiopians. 2013. African Studies Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp. 16-28.
[28]	Varisco DM. On the meaning of chewing the significance of qāt (catha edulis) in the Yemen Arab Republic. International Journal of Middle East Studies 1986; 18(01): 1-13.
[29]	Cochrane L, O’Regan D. Legal harvest and illegal trade: Trends, challenges, and options in khat production in Ethiopia. International Journal of Drug Policy 2016; 30: 27-34.
[30]	Feyisa TH, Aune JB. Khat expansion in the Ethiopian highlands: Effects on the farming system in Habro district. Mountain Research and Development 2003; 23(2): 185-189.
[31]	Gebissa E. Scourge of life or an economic lifeline? Public discourses on khat (Catha edulis) in Ethiopia. Subst Use Misuse 2008; 43(6): 784-802.
[32]	Govereh J, Jayne TS. Cash cropping and food crop productivity: synergies or trade‐offs? Agricultural economics 2003; 28(1): 39-50.
[33]	Njiru N, Muluvi A, Owuor G, Langat J. Effects of Khat Production on Rural Household’s Income In Gachoka Division Mbeere South District Kenya. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development 2013; 4(2): 54-63.
[34]	Barrett CB, Reardon T, Webb P. Nonfarm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa: concepts, dynamics, and policy implications. Food Policy 2001; 26(4): 315-331.
[35]	Reardon T, Stamoulis K, Balisacan A, Cruz M, Berdegué J, Banks B. Rural non-farm income in developing countries. The state of food and agriculture 1998; 1998: 283-356.
[36]	Block S, Webb P. The dynamics of livelihood diversification in post-famine Ethiopia. Food Policy 2001; 26(4): 333-350.
[37]	Boru D, Schwartz M, Kam M, Degen AA. Effects of Family Size and Wealth on Size of Land Cultivated by Borana Pastoralists in Southern Ethiopia. Hum Ecol 2015; 43(1): 15-28.
[38]	Lanjouw P, Ravallion M. Poverty and household size. Econ J 1995 11; 105(433): 1415-1434.
[39]	Frelat R, Lopez-Ridaura S, Giller KE, Herrero M, Douxchamps S, Djurfeldt AA, et al. Drivers of household food availability in sub-Saharan Africa based on big data from small farms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016; 113(2): 458.
[40]	Open data kit: Tools to build information services for developing regions. Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on information and communication technologies and developmentACM; 2010.
[41]	Bennett S, Radalowicz A, Vella V, Tomkins A. A computer simulation of household sampling schemes for health surveys in developing countries. Int J Epidemiol 1994; 23(6): 1282-91.