Journal of Food Security. 2019, 7(6), 206-211
DOI: 10.12691/JFS-7-6-3
Original Research

Household Coping Mechanism For Fisheries Community Food Security Issue

Atikah Nurhayati1, and A.H. Purnomo2

1Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia

2Research Center for Marine and Fisheries Product Processing and Biotechnology, Indonesia

Pub. Date: December 29, 2019

Cite this paper

Atikah Nurhayati and A.H. Purnomo. Household Coping Mechanism For Fisheries Community Food Security Issue. Journal of Food Security. 2019; 7(6):206-211. doi: 10.12691/JFS-7-6-3

Abstract

Food is a basic human need. Many communities, including the fishing and aquaculture communities, are still facing difficulty in fulfilling food sufficiency. Fishing and aquaculture households attempt coping mechanisms independently, but they are constrained by a variety of factors and thus the government should come with a help to overcome constraints. This research aims to identify problems of food security in fishing and aquaculture communities, analyze determining factors, identify attempts undertaken by fishermen and aquaculture operators, and identify relevant government roles. This research used a case study approach in Pangandaran District, with data collected through surveys. Respondents were selected purposively: 10 fishermen, 10 aquaculture operators, 10 fish processors, 10 fish traders, and two West Java Provincial Marine Fisheries Service officials. Research was conducted in April – October 2019. Household food security of fishermen/aquaculture operators was measured using a Multiple Linear Regression. Based on this research was detected that 60% of households were categorized as secured, 15% less secured, 15% vulnerable, and 10% unsecured. Households of fishermen/aquaculture operators responded to these conditions with a variety of coping mechanisms: allocating parts of fish production for household consumption, selling some others to buy various kinds of food, and processing some others to get added value. These coping mechanisms were constrained by a number of factors, among which and the most important ones were knowledge and skills, capital, facilities and infrastructure, and market access. Government policy, therefore, should be focused on handling these constraining factors.

Keywords

household coping mechanism, food security, fishing and aquaculture communities, pangandaran

Copyright

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]  Nurhayati, A., Purnomo, A.H. (2017). Developing the Marine and Fisheries Industry in Pangandaran using a Bioecoregion-Based Technopark Framework. Journal of STI Policy and Management, 2(1), 43-52.
 
[2]  Food Security Agency. 2016. Strategic Plan for the Food Security Agency 2015 - 2019. http://bkp.pertanian.go.id/statis-31-renstra 2015-2019. html Accessed on November 5, 2017
 
[3]  Wiranthi PE, Suwarsinah HK, Adhi AK. 2014. Determinants of household food security: a comparative analysis of Eastern and Western Indonesia. J Agric Sci. 15(1): 17-28.
 
[4]  Republic of Indonesia. 2012. Law of The Republic Indonesia No. 18 of 2012. Concerning Food. https://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/atur/UU18-2012Pangan.pdf. Accessed on July 2, 2019.
 
[5]  Barrett CB (2010) Measuring food insecurity. Science 327: 825-828.
 
[6]  Maxwell DG (1996) Measuring food insecurity: the frequency and severity of coping strategies. Food Policy 21: 291–303
 
[7]  Nurhayati., A. et.al. 2011. Cakrawala Pasang Surut Nelayan. “Cakrawala Tides for fishermen”Unpad Press.
 
[8]  Suryana A. 2004. "Food Security in Indonesia". Proceedings of the National Food and Nutrition Widyakarya VIII. LIPI. Food and Nutrition Resilience in the Era of Regional Autonomy and Globalization. Jakarta.
 
[9]  FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization). Policy Brief Food Security. June 2006 Issue 2. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/faoitaly/documents/pdf/pdf_Food_Security_Cocept_Note.pdf. Accessed on July 2, 2019.
 
[10]  FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization) Final Report of The International Conference on Nutrition. Rome December, 1992. http://www.fao.org/3/u9265e/u9265e00.pdf. Accessed on July 2, 2019.
 
[11]  Republic of Indonesia. Law of The Republic Indonesia No 31 of 2004. Concering Fisheries. http://www.dpr.go.id/dokjdih/document/uu/32.pdf. Accessed on July 2, 2019.
 
[12]  Salim, FD dan Darmawaty 2016. Analysis of Household Food Security of The Fishers Labors in The Village of Bajo Sangkuang South Halmahera Regency. Journal of socio-economic marine and fisheries. Vol 11 No 1. 2016. http://ejournal-balitbang.kkp.go.id/index.php/sosek/article/view/3177. Accessed on July 2, 2019
 
[13]  Maxwell D McLevin, Klemeser MA. Rull M, Morris S. Aliadeke C. 2000. Urban livelihoods and Food Nutition Security in Greater Accra, Ghana. IFPRI in collaborative with Noguchi Memorial for Medical Research and World Health Organization, Research Report No.112. Washington, D.C.
 
[14]  Nazir, Moh. (2013). Research methods. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
 
[15]  Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Int. J. Services Sciences, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 83-98.
 
[16]  Nurhayati.,A. et.al. (2018). Promoting innovative business in the fishery sector in West Java, Indonesia. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 137 (2018) 012100.
 
[17]  Maxwell DG (1996) Measuring food insecurity: the frequency and severity of coping strategies. Food Policy 21: 291-303.